Well, it seems that the AFA has recently reworked their clergy program as well. Having listened to a recent interview with Stephen McNallen on Ravencast it sounds like the AFA as a whole is going through a significant revisioning of their purpose in the wider Heathen/Asatru/Forn Sed world. I am considering signing up for a membership there as well, because like the Troth, they require a year's membership before inclusion in their clerical studies. I like the idea of having alternatives, as the Troth has its too-fluffy moments. I don't know if I would want to go in that direction with either organization (or with both), but perhaps in a year I might. Either way I'm not out much cash for the effort and both produce halfway decent periodicals included with membership that make it worth it just for that.
The only other groups I've seen take the issue of clerical study seriously are the Theodish groups (Garman Lord, the Wodening brothers, et al..). There has been some amazing good scholarship coming from this part of the wider heathen world and in particular I have been impressed with their emphasis on language and linguistics. Having a background in anthropology, I can in particular understand and appreciate the cultural value of reviving our languages along with the traditions.
That being said, I'm not sure if I am in agreement with specifically the social structures that they impose under the auspices of cultural revival. In particular, I object to classifying newcomers as 'thralls'. Now, I will put a big caveat on all this that I haven't yet done sufficient research on the topic of germanic social structures, but its my current understand that 'thralls' = 'slaves' and to be a thrall meant you were either a foreign-captured slave, or a cast-off who's parents would not acknowledge you, i.e. of zero social standing. This just does not jive with the standing of a person of independent will & means looking to join a spiritual community for learning and fellowship. Fealty is a two-way street who's passage needs to be earned in both directions. You do not start earning that by stripping a neonate's status as independent freeman/woman first and thereby putting them at a disadvantage. Now I understand that especially if you want to establish a hierarchy, that the neonate would be on the lowest tier -- but they are on that first tier, not the ground. They have made the conscious choice to seek out this culture and dedicate themselves to it; these neonates are the community's future and that gives them inherent status.
There are two reasons I can think of as to why a group would support the use of the the term 'thrall'. The first and more understandable is that it is used simply to imply the bottom of the social hierarchy and nothing more. There are only so many words in the lexicon of the germanic languages to describe class/status and this worked when these traditions were established. The second, and potentially far less honorable, is that the leadership of these organizations feels insecure when confronted by the influx of new ideas from new people and thus needs to give themselves a beginning advantage. At a minimum its not a very sporting attitude. Of course, without the economics of the feudal system behind all of this, such a hierarchical structure seems rather empty and void of the cultural significance that such groups wish to impart.
Now, before someone gets their undies in a bunch over this, I am openly admitting that I haven't researched this topic well and that this is only an opinion based on my current observations and conclusions. I heartily encourage debate over this and if you feel I've got any of it and/or all of it wrong, please explain why! That's most of what is engaging about a place like this, the exchange of ideas :)
In Frith,
Sena
Edit [08/17/2007]: I just want to thank
hildiwulf for a great extended dicussion about thralldom over email the last couple weeks. It's far too much to summarize here, but in short it resolved for me the dissonance between the Theodish idea of thralldom and what assumptions I was bringing into the idea. I have a much better understanding now and my opinion on the topic has changed drastically from what's stated above. If I have the time, I will post later elaborating further. I am honoured by the patience he showed in the dialogue it took for me to wrap my brain around it.